From: | Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com |
Cc: | Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, José Luis Tallón <jltallon(at)adv-solutions(dot)net> |
Subject: | Re: CREATE IF NOT EXISTS INDEX |
Date: | 2014-10-05 12:52:19 |
Message-ID: | CABRT9RDTMwN03TjyH42NNOvpfD=Kiv5hhY0dbBNLfJCxg0XdKw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 7:25 PM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello
<fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I agree with your grammar change.
Cool.
> The version 5 (attached) contains all discussed until now.
From documentation:
CREATE INDEX ... [ IF NOT EXISTS name | name ] ON ...
Maybe I'm just slow, but it took me a few minutes to understand what
this means. :)
I would add a human-language explanation to IF NOT EXISTS description:
Index name is required when IF NOT EXISTS is specified
----
You have resurrected this bit again, which now conflicts with git master...
- write_msg(NULL, "reading row-security enabled for table \"%s\"",
+ write_msg(NULL, "reading row-security enabled for table \"%s\"\n",
----
n->concurrent = $4;
+ n->if_not_exists = false;
n->idxname = $5;
Minor stylistic thing: now that this is a constant, I would move it to
the end together with other constant assignments, and follow the
struct's field ordering (in both code paths):
n->isconstraint = false;
n->deferrable = false;
n->initdeferred = false;
n->if_not_exists = false;
Regards,
Marti
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2014-10-05 14:25:50 | Re: RLS with check option - surprised design |
Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2014-10-05 12:16:01 | Re: RLS with check option - surprised design |