| From: | Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PoC: Partial sort |
| Date: | 2014-01-28 10:36:54 |
| Message-ID: | CABRT9RCpwRRyEkkaGoZOx9pXT6AgRULSSd5yW6-gV+FoD43EkQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 7:51 AM, Alexander Korotkov
<aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I didn't test it, but I worry that overhead might be high.
> If it's true then it could be like constraint_exclusion option which id off
> by default because of planning overhead.
I see, that makes sense.
I will try to find the time to run some benchmarks in the coming few days.
Regards,
Marti
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Cédric Villemain | 2014-01-28 10:42:05 | Re: alternative back-end block formats |
| Previous Message | Jeremy Harris | 2014-01-28 10:32:51 | Re: A better way than tweaking NTUP_PER_BUCKET |