| From: | Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PoC: Partial sort |
| Date: | 2014-02-06 19:32:50 |
| Message-ID: | CABRT9RCp9MvWkmYFwR7tNwF0gLGPVr4OCxrv5XAZBsWKmGgjjA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 9:15 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> It may be that having the capability to do a
> partial sort makes it seem worth spending more CPU looking for merge
> joins, but I'd vote for making any such change a separate patch.
Agreed.
Alexander, should I work on splitting up the patch in two, or do you
want to do it yourself?
Should I merge my coding style and enable_partialsort patches while at
it, or do you still have reservations about those?
Regards,
Marti
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2014-02-06 19:42:29 | Re: PoC: Partial sort |
| Previous Message | Marti Raudsepp | 2014-02-06 19:25:01 | Re: Fwd: Proposal: variant of regclass |