Re: Draft release notes up for review

From: Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Draft release notes up for review
Date: 2014-02-19 18:29:38
Message-ID: CABRT9RBy+b0xiKovjey1+heU3yy5_qTCu5FsiKV6mPKDafpU3A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 10:41 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Any comments before I start transposing them into the back branches?

Sorry I'm late.

> Shore up GRANT ... WITH ADMIN OPTION restrictions (Noah Misch)

I'm not familiar with the phrase "Shore up", I think it should use
more precise language: are the privilege checks getting more strict or
less strict?

----

Wow, there are quite a lot of items this time. Have you considered
grouping the items by their impact, for example security/data
corruption/crash/correctness/other? I think that would make it easier
for readers to find items they're interested in. Most changes seem
pretty straightforward to categorize; there are always outliers, but
even if a few items are miscategorized, that's an improvement over
what we have now. Of course someone has to be willing to do that work.

If this warrants more discussion, I can draft out a proposal in a new topic.

Regards,
Marti

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2014-02-19 18:31:06 Re: Changeset Extraction v7.6.1
Previous Message Robert Haas 2014-02-19 18:07:11 Re: Changeset Extraction v7.6.1