From: | Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Draft release notes up for review |
Date: | 2014-02-19 18:29:38 |
Message-ID: | CABRT9RBy+b0xiKovjey1+heU3yy5_qTCu5FsiKV6mPKDafpU3A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 10:41 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Any comments before I start transposing them into the back branches?
Sorry I'm late.
> Shore up GRANT ... WITH ADMIN OPTION restrictions (Noah Misch)
I'm not familiar with the phrase "Shore up", I think it should use
more precise language: are the privilege checks getting more strict or
less strict?
----
Wow, there are quite a lot of items this time. Have you considered
grouping the items by their impact, for example security/data
corruption/crash/correctness/other? I think that would make it easier
for readers to find items they're interested in. Most changes seem
pretty straightforward to categorize; there are always outliers, but
even if a few items are miscategorized, that's an improvement over
what we have now. Of course someone has to be willing to do that work.
If this warrants more discussion, I can draft out a proposal in a new topic.
Regards,
Marti
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2014-02-19 18:31:06 | Re: Changeset Extraction v7.6.1 |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2014-02-19 18:07:11 | Re: Changeset Extraction v7.6.1 |