Re: PostgreSQL 9.3 beta breaks some extensions "make install"

From: Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org>
To: Cédric Villemain <cedric(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 9.3 beta breaks some extensions "make install"
Date: 2013-09-23 15:23:49
Message-ID: CABRT9RBa-SFwHgBDObSHOrwiZYYOoqXO8uEJXqPurYWcMT8HVw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 8:17 PM, Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 6:42 PM, Cédric Villemain <cedric(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> Andrew is about to commit (well...I hope) a doc patch about that and also a little fix.
>> Imho this is a bugfix so I hope it will be applyed in older branches.
>
> Oh I see, indeed commit 6697aa2bc25c83b88d6165340348a31328c35de6
> "Improve support for building PGXS modules with VPATH" fixes the
> problem and I see it's not present in REL9_3_0.
>
> Andrew and others, does this seem safe enough to backport to 9.3.1?

Ping? Will this be backported to 9.3 or should I report to extension
authors to fix their Makefiles?

I understand that the 9.3.1 release might still be weeks away, I'd
just like to get a vague confirmation about what committers think.

Note that this patch is already applied to Debian/Ubuntu packages
(including those on apt.postgresql.org)

Regards,
Marti

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2013-09-23 15:31:40 Re: PostgreSQL 9.3 beta breaks some extensions "make install"
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2013-09-23 14:19:43 Re: pg_stat_statements: calls under-estimation propagation