On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 12:34 AM, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to> wrote:
> Here's a patch removing the incorrect part.
I can see how this doc statement can be misunderstood, but I think the
claims are actually about data types, not the number of columns in the
INTO list.
I think clarifying the number of columns quirk would be better than
removing this text.
Regards,
Marti