Re: Caching for stable expressions with constant arguments v6

From: Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Caching for stable expressions with constant arguments v6
Date: 2012-08-27 14:44:32
Message-ID: CABRT9RAJfrMxh1A+3WxNLDhWac6o9VTg27n7gwPsX37XuVhitg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> Where are we on this?

TL;DR: Got a review, requires substantial work, current github branch
is slightly broken, will get back to this soon.

Tom Lane sent a thorough review of the patch here:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2012-03/msg00655.php
(very much appreciated!)

I have addressed some smaller points from that list in my github
branch, but it still requires a substantial amount of work (in
particular, the bulk of this patch which is the recursion logic in
eval_const_expressions_mutator, needs to be changed to prevent
unnecessary CacheExpr insertions and to store intermediate state in
the context struct).

I got a small fragment of this into PostgreSQL 9.2 as commit
81a646febe87964725647a36d839f6b4b405f3ae. I rebased my github branch
on top of this commit, but the rebase introduced some test failures
that I have not tracked down yet. I don't know if it applies to git
HEAD any more.

Sadly some other things intervened and I have not had the time to
return to hacking on this patch. But I am hopeful I can get it into
shape during the 9.3 cycle.

Regards,
Marti

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kasahara Tatsuhito 2012-08-27 14:47:28 Re: A caveat of partitioning tables in the document
Previous Message Alexander Korotkov 2012-08-27 14:17:44 Re: Statistics and selectivity estimation for ranges