Re: Views "missing" from information_schema.view_table_usage

From: Jonathan Lemig <jtlemig(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Erik Wienhold <ewie(at)ewie(dot)name>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Views "missing" from information_schema.view_table_usage
Date: 2022-12-02 22:22:13
Message-ID: CABR8q_8dyq8LwdMvkNpeT6OfBv2mqTTza1t0h1Qem1qAmTODfg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-general

It probably wouldn't hurt to have that added to the documentation.
I'll post a message to pgsql-docs. Thanks again!

Jon

On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 4:14 PM Jonathan Lemig <jtlemig(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Hi Erik - sorry I missed your reply when I replied to David's. That is
> indeed the issue. The object that the view is querying is a materialized
> view.
>
> Thanks for the link.
>
> Jon
>
> On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 3:33 PM Erik Wienhold <ewie(at)ewie(dot)name> wrote:
>
>> > On 02/12/2022 21:51 CET Jonathan Lemig <jtlemig(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Has anybody ever encountered this, and if so, did you find a resolution?
>> > Or perhaps there other limitations with the VTU that I'm unaware of?
>>
>> Is the one view you cannot find in view_table_usage a materialized view?
>> Because those are not covered by view_table_usage[1].
>>
>> [1]
>> https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=blob;f=src/backend/catalog/information_schema.sql;h=18725a02d1fb6ffda3d218033b972a0ff23aac3b;hb=HEAD#l2605
>>
>> --
>> Erik
>>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Erik Wienhold 2022-12-02 22:47:21 Re: Views "missing" from information_schema.view_table_usage
Previous Message Jonathan Lemig 2022-12-02 22:14:54 Re: Views "missing" from information_schema.view_table_usage

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Erik Wienhold 2022-12-02 22:47:21 Re: Views "missing" from information_schema.view_table_usage
Previous Message raf 2022-12-02 22:18:52 Re: Stored procedure code no longer stored in v14 and v15, changed behaviour