Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11

From: Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andreas Seltenreich <seltenreich(at)gmx(dot)de>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11
Date: 2018-02-15 11:19:46
Message-ID: CABOikdPtfpMoeWR827-fRy0Q2=3scGaRFDHY+HZ_cG0zJYV09w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Andreas,

On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 5:45 PM, Andreas Seltenreich <seltenreich(at)gmx(dot)de>
wrote:

>
>
> Attached are testcases that trigger the assertions when run against an
> empty database instead of the one left behind by make installcheck. The
> "unrecognized node type" one appears to be a known issue according to
> the wiki, so I didn't bother doing the work for this one as well.
>

Thanks for doing those tests. I've just sent v16a version of the patch and
I think it fixes the issues reported so far. Can you please recheck? Please
let me know if there are other issues detected by sqlsmith or otherwise.

Thanks,
Pavan

--
Pavan Deolasee http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Karlsson 2018-02-15 11:54:34 Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v9.1
Previous Message Pavan Deolasee 2018-02-15 11:17:26 Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11