| From: | Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: rewrite HeapSatisfiesHOTAndKey |
| Date: | 2017-01-05 12:59:17 |
| Message-ID: | CABOikdPJ94fBx-n5LTqNXxRSOk8Fk=72JaH14azBpPXQ9CV3ag@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 6:15 PM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Your test and results look good, what kind of m/c you have used to
> test this.
I ran it on my Macbook Pro, so nothing fancy. The code was compiled with
simple ./confgure and with no special flags. The only non-default setting
was shared_buffers = 512MB to ensure the table/index fits in memory.
> Let me see if I or one of my colleague can do this and
> similar test on some high-end m/c.
>
>
Sure. That'll be helpful given a slight unexpected result. May be it's just
a noise or we may see different result on a high end m/c.
Thanks,
Pavan
--
Pavan Deolasee http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2017-01-05 13:23:54 | Re: Replication/backup defaults |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2017-01-05 12:45:42 | Re: rewrite HeapSatisfiesHOTAndKey |