Re: Storing hot members of PGPROC out of the band

From: Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Storing hot members of PGPROC out of the band
Date: 2011-11-25 04:54:23
Message-ID: CABOikdOisBWjpjUTZ=e-EBO+OWi0yiTkmX=jWoWoMiXNbjvXCg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 7:24 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> I'm going to run some more tests, but my thought is that we should
>> probably leave the recentglobalxmin changes out for the time being,
>> pending further study and consideration of other alternatives.
>
> Agreed
>

+1. These are independent patches and should be pursued like that.
BTW, I reviewed the pgxact-v2.patch and I have no objections to that
and it looks good to go in. Thanks Robert for making the necessary
changes and also running the benchmark tests.

Thanks,
Pavan

--
Pavan Deolasee
EnterpriseDB     http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2011-11-25 06:14:56 Re: proposal: use errcontext for custom exception too
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2011-11-25 04:52:45 Re: [PATCH] Support for foreign keys with arrays