| From: | Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Parallel worker error |
| Date: | 2017-08-30 12:00:39 |
| Message-ID: | CABOikdMZuhr6f1MGVvdJpj36ckrzgVOGh1er3LLa4=mU3mi6Hg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 5:19 PM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
>
>
> I am able to reproduce this without involving session authorization
> guc as well. One needs to drop the newly created role from another
> session, then also we can see the same error.
>
>
Yeah, that's how I first created the case. But concurrent dropping of role
(which is surprisingly allowed even when there are active connections with
the role active) opens another set of errors. Hence I tried to reproduce
this in a single session. While it might be interesting to fix the
concurrent role drop problem someday, the single session problem looks more
pressing.
Thanks,
Pavan
--
Pavan Deolasee http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2017-08-30 12:02:10 | Re: A design for amcheck heapam verification |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2017-08-30 12:00:25 | Re: Re: Poor cost estimate with interaction between table correlation and partial indexes |