From: | Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Jaime Casanova <jaime(dot)casanova(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM) |
Date: | 2017-02-25 05:20:57 |
Message-ID: | CABOikdMTYyvH0av9RMGEA7eYy=9Rk72+OihCAfc+VzKfUEnDDQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 9:47 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> And there are no bugs, right? :-)
Yeah yeah absolutely nothing. Just like any other feature committed to
Postgres so far ;-)
I need to polish the chain conversion patch a bit and also add missing
support for redo, hash indexes etc. Support for hash indexes will need
overloading of ip_posid bits in the index tuple (since there are no free
bits left in hash tuples). I plan to work on that next and submit a fully
functional patch, hopefully before the commit-fest starts.
(I have mentioned the idea of overloading ip_posid bits a few times now and
haven't heard any objection so far. Well, that could either mean that
nobody has read those emails seriously or there is general acceptance to
that idea.. I am assuming latter :-))
Thanks,
Pavan
--
Pavan Deolasee http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2017-02-25 05:59:19 | Re: Proposal : Parallel Merge Join |
Previous Message | Kohei KaiGai | 2017-02-25 04:30:32 | Re: ParallelFinish-hook of FDW/CSP (Re: Steps inside ExecEndGather) |