| From: | Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pg_dump transaction's read-only mode |
| Date: | 2013-01-16 06:21:32 |
| Message-ID: | CABOikdM3vjJt+gR4XEG7qPUQUSk_r=8WQoWf21OBEA_Rbe192w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 6:42 AM, Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>wrote:
>
>>
> I have updated the commitfest submission to link to the correct patch
> email.
>
>
Thanks Gurjeet.
> I initially thought that this patch deserves accompanying documentation
> because pg_dump's serializable transaction may error out because of a
> conflict. But the following line in the docs [1] confirms otherwise:
>
> "read-only transactions will never have serialization conflicts"
>
> So no doc patch necessary :)
>
>
Can you please mark the patch as "Ready for committer" if you think that
way ?
Thanks,
Pavan
--
Pavan Deolasee
http://www.linkedin.com/in/pavandeolasee
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2013-01-16 06:28:09 | Re: Curious buildfarm failures (fwd) |
| Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2013-01-16 05:40:55 | Re: Materialized views WIP patch |