| From: | Pierre Ochsenbein <pierreochsenbein(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net |
| Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pgpool versus which tool? |
| Date: | 2018-10-18 06:46:34 |
| Message-ID: | CABG8FoPk=XkkCOxHDPBFEi5q4Z3sWny2ZSNrfoKNcsodjjsvxA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Nothing it's wrong with pgPool.
I would like to try with a new Middelware software to compare mechanism and
relation with Load Balancing, HA, Failover..ect
Le lun. 15 oct. 2018 à 10:22, Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net> a écrit :
> Pierre Ochsenbein schrieb am 15.10.2018 um 09:38:
> > Which best of tool you recommend to replace pgpool?
> What's wrong with pgPool that you think you need to replace it?
>
> And what is you requirement for such a tool?
>
>
--
Cordialement,
*Pierre Ochsenbein*
Mobile: +33668295394
pierreochsenbein(at)gmail(dot)com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marcus Strube | 2018-10-18 15:44:21 | "constructor" does not work as alias for me |
| Previous Message | Shreeyansh Dba | 2018-10-17 11:20:55 | Re: Pgpool error |