From: | Caleb Meredith <calebmeredith8(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
Subject: | Re: BUG #13780: Multiple commands not allowed for creating a policy. |
Date: | 2015-11-23 13:05:51 |
Message-ID: | CABFpK6197YqUS8+ip2FiTOb+TLF_w1bUDJAO4fu0wGCJNO-QQg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Yes, that makes sense.
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 7:16 AM Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 10:23 PM, <calebmeredith8(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> This doesn't seem to be intended as the GRANT specification allows it, and
>> CREATE POLICY supports the ALL command.
>>
>
> Yeah, I would tend to agree that the existence of ALL contradicts the
> expression constraints that are in place when defining a non-ALL policy as
> we could basically ignore either the WITH CHECK or USING clauses defined in
> a policy defined depending on the DML or SELECT command used. To be more
> exact, for example with an ALL policy that has both a WITH CHECK and USING
> defined, we would ignore the USING clause with an INSERT query, right? We
> are in beta2 state now, so I don't think anything is going to change, but
> Stephen, your thoughts perhaps?
> --
> Michael
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2015-11-23 13:06:26 | Re: pg_dump - wrong order with inheritance |
Previous Message | pinker | 2015-11-23 12:27:58 | pg_dump - wrong order with inheritance |