From: | Luiz Felipph <luizfelipph(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Ranier Vilela <ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Pgsql Performance <pgsql-performance(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Optimal configuration for server |
Date: | 2022-03-07 17:17:53 |
Message-ID: | CABCV0cy6qDuGK_HP-Q5U6Vp=cn8+GDqV6SEPF3BPsFgeM8BkNw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Greatings Ranieri,
Server logs I need ask to someone to get it
Redhat EL 7
Postgres 12
Humm.. I will find out were I should put keep Alive setting
Em seg., 7 de mar. de 2022 13:51, Ranier Vilela <ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com>
escreveu:
> Em seg., 7 de mar. de 2022 às 08:54, Luiz Felipph <luizfelipph(at)gmail(dot)com>
> escreveu:
>
>> Hi everybody!
>>
>> I have a big application running on premise. One of my main database
>> servers has the following configuration:
>>
>> 72 CPUs(2 chips, 18 physical cores per chip, 2 threads) Xeon Gold 6240
>> 1TB of ram or 786GB (5 servers at all)
>> A huge storage( I don't know for sure what kind is, but is very powerful)
>>
>> A consulting company recommended the following configuration for theses
>> main servers(let me know if something important was left behind):
>>
>> maxx_connections = 2000
>> shared_buffers = 32GB
>> temp_buffers = 1024
>> max_prepared_transactions = 3000
>> work_men = 32MB
>> effective_io_concurrency = 200
>> max_worker_processes = 24
>> checkpoint_timeout = 15min
>> max_wal_size = 64GB
>> min_wall_size = 2GB
>> effective_cache_size = 96GB
>> (...)
>>
>> I Think this is too low memory setting for de size of server... The
>> number of connections, I'm still measuring to reduce this value( I think
>> it's too high for the needs of application, but untill hit a value too high
>> to justfy any memory issue, I think is not a problem)
>>
>> My current problem:
>>
>> under heavyload, i'm getting "connection closed" on the application
>> level(java-jdbc, jboss ds)
>>
> Server logs?
> What OS (version)
> What Postgres version.
> Keep-alive may not be configured at the client side?
>
> regards,
> Ranier Vilela
>
>>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ranier Vilela | 2022-03-07 17:39:49 | Re: Optimal configuration for server |
Previous Message | Ranier Vilela | 2022-03-07 16:51:35 | Re: Optimal configuration for server |