From: | Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | fburgess(at)radiantblue(dot)com |
Cc: | postgres performance list <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PG-General Mailing List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PERFORM] Very slow query in PostgreSQL 9.3.3 |
Date: | 2014-03-14 02:19:10 |
Message-ID: | CAB8KJ=j3Yvvq4J-LPJYOoFqya+G=R07yNgv3NMDH+o_PMOnr0g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-general pgsql-performance |
2014-03-14 4:26 GMT+09:00 <fburgess(at)radiantblue(dot)com>:
> PostgreSQL 9.3.3 RHEL 6.4
>
> Total db Server memory 64GB
(...)
> effective_cache_size = 48MB
I'm not sure if this will help directly, but is the value for
'effective_cache_size' intentional? 48 *GB* would be a more likely
setting.
Regards
Ian Barwick
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | sunyx | 2014-03-14 02:55:01 | BUG #9566: Function has no effent |
Previous Message | Abib | 2014-03-14 00:18:41 | need information licenses costs. |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Welton | 2014-03-14 10:37:35 | Re: named queries and the wire protocol |
Previous Message | Sergey Konoplev | 2014-03-13 22:12:25 | Re: [BUGS] Very slow query in PostgreSQL 9.3.3 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | acanada | 2014-03-14 11:30:03 | Adding new field to big table |
Previous Message | Sergey Konoplev | 2014-03-13 22:12:25 | Re: [BUGS] Very slow query in PostgreSQL 9.3.3 |