Re: ExecRTCheckPerms() and many prunable partitions

From: Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Zhihong Yu <zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ExecRTCheckPerms() and many prunable partitions
Date: 2022-11-03 23:46:02
Message-ID: CAB8KJ=hfLN2t70S4hn+hJCAXUTuVhHTnRddhXGa4wt729nZONg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2022年10月15日(土) 15:01 Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2022 at 4:31 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 7, 2022 at 3:49 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 7, 2022 at 1:25 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Oct 7, 2022 at 10:04 AM Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 10:29 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > > > > > Actually, List of Bitmapsets turned out to be something that doesn't
> > > > > > just-work with our Node infrastructure, which I found out thanks to
> > > > > > -DWRITE_READ_PARSE_PLAN_TREES. So, I had to go ahead and add
> > > > > > first-class support for copy/equal/write/read support for Bitmapsets,
> > > > > > such that writeNode() can write appropriately labeled versions of them
> > > > > > and nodeRead() can read them as Bitmapsets. That's done in 0003. I
> > > > > > didn't actually go ahead and make *all* Bitmapsets in the plan trees
> > > > > > to be Nodes, but maybe 0003 can be expanded to do that. We won't need
> > > > > > to make gen_node_support.pl emit *_BITMAPSET_FIELD() blurbs then; can
> > > > > > just use *_NODE_FIELD().
> > > > >
> > > > > All meson builds on the cfbot machines seem to have failed, maybe
> > > > > because I didn't update src/include/nodes/meson.build to add
> > > > > 'nodes/bitmapset.h' to the `node_support_input_i` collection. Here's
> > > > > an updated version assuming that's the problem. (Will set up meson
> > > > > builds on my machine to avoid this in the future.)
> > > >
> > > > And... noticed that a postgres_fdw test failed, because
> > > > _readBitmapset() not having been changed to set NodeTag would
> > > > "corrupt" any Bitmapsets that were created with it set.
> > >
> > > Broke the other cases while fixing the above. Attaching a new version
> > > again. In the latest version, I'm setting Bitmapset.type by hand with
> > > an XXX comment nearby saying that it would be nice to change that to
> > > makeNode(Bitmapset), which I know sounds pretty ad-hoc.
> >
> > Sorry, I attached the wrong patches with the last email. The
> > "correct" v22 attached this time.
>
> Rebased over c037471832.

This entry was marked as "Needs review" in the CommitFest app but cfbot
reports the patch no longer applies.

We've marked it as "Waiting on Author". As CommitFest 2022-11 is
currently underway, this would be an excellent time update the patch.

Once you think the patchset is ready for review again, you (or any
interested party) can move the patch entry forward by visiting

https://commitfest.postgresql.org/40/3224/

and changing the status to "Needs review".

Thanks

Ian Barwick

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2022-11-03 23:49:24 Re: security_context_t marked as deprecated in libselinux 3.1
Previous Message Jacob Champion 2022-11-03 23:39:17 Re: [PATCH] Add `verify-system` sslmode to use system CA pool for server cert