From: | Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Is anyone using db_user_namespace? |
Date: | 2023-07-11 01:24:55 |
Message-ID: | CAB8KJ=gQFhKYELgSLoBPBt=Q9nMvdu9ccsNOVNpp18K1fo3Vkw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
2023年7月11日(火) 2:45 Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>
> On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 02:56:08PM -0700, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> > Over in pgsql-hackers, I've proposed removing the db_user_namespace
> > parameter in v17 [0]. I am personally not aware of anyone using this
> > parameter, but I wanted to give folks an opportunity to object in case they
> > are using it (or are aware of someone who is).
> >
> > [0] https://postgr.es/m/20230630200509.GA2830328%40nathanxps13
>
> Bumping this thread. As long as no objections materialize, I plan to
> remove this parameter shortly.
Never used it myself; funnily enough I stumbled on it a few weeks back
and wondered if it was some nifty feature I'd overlooked, then I realized
I've stumbled across it before several times and each time promptly
forgotten about it.
Moreover a quick Google search (in quotation marks) brings up a
few pages mainly of documentation copies, configuration file snippets
happening to contain "db_user_namespace", a few mostly very non-recent
mailing list/forum questions, but nothing which screams "this feature
is used widely".
Regards
Ian Barwick
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2023-07-11 01:28:12 | Re: Problematic enforcement of "ERROR: functions in index predicate must be marked IMMUTABLE" |
Previous Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2023-07-11 01:14:29 | Re: Problematic enforcement of "ERROR: functions in index predicate must be marked IMMUTABLE" |