| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Pinning a buffer in TupleTableSlot is unnecessary |
| Date: | 2017-02-01 04:41:03 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqTyZPda7BjpK5fQS-1K94cjcDw-f03gQVhYnOp+iaszkw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 2:53 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> The latest patch available still applies, one person has added his
> name (John G) in October though there have been no reviews. There have
> been a couple of arguments against this patch, and the thread has had
> no activity for the last month, so I would be incline to mark that as
> returned with feedback. Thoughts?
And done as such. Feel free to update if there is something fresh.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-02-01 04:42:40 | Re: Reporting planning time with EXPLAIN |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-02-01 04:39:50 | Re: Proposal : Parallel Merge Join |