From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: A note about debugging TAP failures |
Date: | 2017-04-23 02:31:05 |
Message-ID: | CAB7nPqTttEoHXtGtmm202cWqhkLuaDKRdZX3UDbuFB62k_pz4w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 7:48 AM, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:
> Skipping the tempdir and instead using ${testname}_data_${name} without a
> random suffix, we can achieve this with something along the lines of the
> attached PoC. It works as now (retain of failure, remove on success unless
> overridden) but that logic can easily be turned around if we want that. If
> it’s of interest I can pursue this after some sleep (tomorrow has become today
> at this point).
Yes, something like that may make sense as well for readability.
Keeping folders in case of failures is something that I have been
advocating in favor of for some time, but this never got into the tree
:(
There is a patch from Horiguchi-san that allows actually such a thing,
have a look at patch 0006 on this email:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAMsr+YEc2Ek=qJFJ2JeV7Spz69pOduoUJXBowZMppVYdeieRdA@mail.gmail.com
The same concept rebased gives the attached. I didn't double-check the
compatibility with past versions of Test:More though..
--
Michael
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
tap-keep-tempdirs.patch | text/x-patch | 390 bytes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2017-04-23 02:37:06 | Statistics "dependency" |
Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2017-04-23 02:11:40 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Replication lag tracking for walsenders |