From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Assignment of valid collation for SET operations on queries with UNKNOWN types. |
Date: | 2016-12-14 10:09:36 |
Message-ID: | CAB7nPqTqzetKOmJ_ErtHMtbRUkjbRU4hswh-oVOgtqeifOuOgg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 7:02 PM, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>There is a similar code pattern for materialized views, see
>>create_ctas_nodata() where the attribute list is built
> create_ctas_nodata() is for creation of materialized views WITH NO DATA.
> For other materialized views and CREATE TABLE AS, column definitions are
> built in
> intorel_startup() function which has different code from that of CREATE VIEW
> which
> the patch deals with.
>
> Limiting the scope of the patch to include changing the type of literal
> constants
> to text only for plain views. Also, error out when column with UNKNOWN type
> is
> being created for other relations like tables and materialized views.
Matviews is the same way of thinking as views in terms of definition.
It is inconsistent to try to address a problem only partially if the
same behavior shows up in different code paths.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2016-12-14 10:15:28 | Re: pg_authid.rolpassword format (was Re: Password identifiers, protocol aging and SCRAM protocol) |
Previous Message | Rahila Syed | 2016-12-14 10:02:34 | Re: Assignment of valid collation for SET operations on queries with UNKNOWN types. |