Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning
Date: 2017-11-30 02:18:11
Message-ID: CAB7nPqToJPMzSR_xrJNH95em+qLEfLEFbHhRP-8fdN=1gD1J8Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 10:43 AM, Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> I'm working on a revised version of these patches to address recent
> comments by Horiguchi-san. I will also consider the points above before
> sending the new version.

Ok, this is fresh news, so I am moving this entry to next CF with
waiting on author as status.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2017-11-30 02:22:25 Re: [HACKERS] Lazy hash table for XidInMVCCSnapshot (helps Zipfian a bit)
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2017-11-30 02:16:57 Re: [HACKERS] Secondary index access optimizations