| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Inoue, Hiroshi" <inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Mentioning CPU for Windows build in docs |
| Date: | 2014-06-02 12:11:12 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqToEUdr=c0uuF4j4vOCQ5-QM==_Etr0MigJQxnCr2131A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-odbc |
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 8:54 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
<hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> wrote:
> On 06/02/2014 02:35 PM, Inoue, Hiroshi wrote:
>>
>> Official Windows build no longer uses nmake.
>> The binaries are built using MSBuild.
>> Please look at readme_winbuild.txt or winbuild/readme.txt.
> Huh? Really?
> Why did we switch? What's the advantage of MSBuild over nmake?
Well... If that counts I'd like to mention that I use nmake now for
windows builds... And not only for dev.
> The Win32 compilation instructions in the documentation need updating, if
> we're really going to switch to MSBuild..
Definitely, it would also be better to merge all the instructions for
compilation into a single place.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | lev.bukovski | 2014-06-02 13:11:08 | Re: Prepared statement error with UseServerSidePrepare=1 |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2014-06-02 11:54:55 | Re: Mentioning CPU for Windows build in docs |