Re: perlcritic

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: perlcritic
Date: 2015-09-01 04:24:56
Message-ID: CAB7nPqTmkjObHbihQy9ykSHzt=wmfShbw1zz_rUz-z5e4iO3rw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 12:57 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> We now have 80+ Perl files in our tree, and it's growing. Some of those
> files were originally written for Perl 4, and the coding styles and
> quality are quite, uh, divergent. So I figured it's time to clean up
> that code a bit. I ran perlcritic over the tree and cleaned up all the
> warnings at level 5 (the default, least severe).

Do you think we should be concerned about the increased difficulty to
backpatch fixes if this patch is applied? I personally think that's
fine to do this cleanup on HEAD only, still others may have a
different opinion.

> Testing guidelines:
> - msvc files need to be tested separately. I tested as best as I could
> on a non-Windows system.

And tested on Windows, I am not seeing failures.
--
Michael

In response to

  • perlcritic at 2015-09-01 03:57:25 from Peter Eisentraut

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Satoshi Nagayasu 2015-09-01 04:29:29 Re: pg_stat_statements query jumbling question
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2015-09-01 04:13:07 Unicode mapping scripts cleanup