| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
| Subject: | Re: amcheck (B-Tree integrity checking tool) |
| Date: | 2016-08-19 00:35:34 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqTi2rGSO12+3Gyka3weD9wYzxniLc3WTDwbLCPu+g3RRA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 9:14 AM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 5:06 PM, Michael Paquier
> <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Cool. I have been honestly wondering about deploying this tool as well
>> to allow some of the QE tests to perform live checks of btree indexes
>> as we use a bunch of them.
>
> I'd certainly welcome that. There are Debian packages available from
> the Github version of amcheck, which is otherwise practically
> identical to the most recent version of the patch posted here:
>
> https://github.com/petergeoghegan/amcheck
This would be packaged from source in my case, but that's no big deal
:) At least I can see that it is added in the next CF, and that's
marked as ready for committer for a couple of months now...
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2016-08-19 00:35:47 | Re: _mdfd_getseg can be expensive |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2016-08-19 00:28:58 | Re: _mdfd_getseg can be expensive |