From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Subject: | Re: WAL consistency check facility |
Date: | 2017-02-14 22:16:37 |
Message-ID: | CAB7nPqTggEqZAwjw9zs1v=4TCQcTtm3+fvuyAoVMOZGX2cVCYA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 2:43 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 8:17 PM, Michael Paquier
> <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Please find attached a patch with those fixes.
>
> Committed, but I changed the copyright dates to 2016-2017 rather than
> just 2017 since surely some of the code was originally written before
> 2017. Even that might not really be going back far enough, but it
> doesn't matter too much.
Just for curiosity: does the moment when the code has been written or
committed counts? It's no big deal seeing how liberal the Postgres
license is, but this makes me wonder...
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2017-02-14 22:44:30 | Re: Skipping PgStat_FunctionCallUsage for many expressions |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-02-14 22:13:42 | Re: renaming pg_resetxlog to pg_resetwal has broken pg_upgrade. |