Re: PATCH: index-only scans with partial indexes

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PATCH: index-only scans with partial indexes
Date: 2016-02-27 12:49:07
Message-ID: CAB7nPqTcjv4p76FHG_0wHVG7tbcDifmQfO3U7kiGqWcT3dJ0Xg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 1:08 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 6:16 PM, Michael Paquier
> <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
>> <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>>> I marked this as "ready for commiter" and tried to add me as the
>>> *second* author. But the CF app forces certain msyterious order
>>> for listed names. Is there any means to arrange the author names
>>> in desired order?
>>
>> Those are automatically classified by alphabetical order.
>
> Doh.

Hm? Not sure I am getting that. My point if that they could appear in
the order they have been entered by the user or the order they have
been saved, in which case one could take advantage of that to define
the a list of authors ordered by the amount of work they did.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2016-02-27 13:09:22 Re: proposal: get oldest LSN - function
Previous Message Álvaro Hernández Tortosa 2016-02-27 11:58:58 Re: The plan for FDW-based sharding