| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: WAL consistency check facility |
| Date: | 2016-09-16 13:36:40 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqT_2h1VfBwrjrPnfoTxZhsrcjCHpDFYGRxUyOwzs50s7A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 10:30 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I don't think you have the right to tell Kuntal that he has to move
> the patch to the next CommitFest because there are unspecified things
> about the current version you don't like. If you don't have time to
> review further, that's your call, but he can leave the patch as Needs
> Review and see if someone else has time.
No complain from here if done this way. I don't mean any offense :)
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-09-16 13:37:08 | Re: Printing bitmap objects in the debugger |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2016-09-16 13:33:50 | Re: WIP: About CMake v2 |