Re: Notes on testing Postgres 10b1

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)berkus(dot)org>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Notes on testing Postgres 10b1
Date: 2017-06-07 05:29:04
Message-ID: CAB7nPqTZNjxKxKtHz6+RACTvjcEhcbdWCEwrrN3S1ZMXk2+GYA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 2:01 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)berkus(dot)org> wrote:
> Q1. Why does wal_level default to "replica" and not "logical"?

The difference of WAL generated is way higher between
archive->hot_standby than hot_standby->logical. And unlike replica,
logical decoding is not something that is widely spread in user's
deployments to justify changing to such a default. At least that's
what I recall on the matter.

> Q2: I thought we were going to finally change the pg_dump default to
> "custom" format in this release? No?

I don't recall any discussion on this matter, but my memory may fail me.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2017-06-07 05:32:43 Re: Notes on testing Postgres 10b1
Previous Message Amit Langote 2017-06-07 05:23:48 Re: BEFORE trigger can cause undetected partition constraint violation