| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Review of Refactoring code for sync node detection |
| Date: | 2014-11-17 13:09:36 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqTVr2pYY9L3PJxV+sEt89rcRATsJunYTfkzwStH0DnXfA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:00 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 16 November 2014 12:07, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> Let's work
>> the multiple node thing once we have a better spec of how to do it,
>> visibly using a dedicated micro-language within s_s_names.
>
> Hmm, please make sure that is a new post. That is easily something I
> could disagree with, even though I support the need for more
> functionality.
Sure. I am not really on that yet though :)
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2014-11-17 13:22:22 | Re: WAL format and API changes (9.5) |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2014-11-17 13:00:30 | Re: Review of Refactoring code for sync node detection |