From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
Cc: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
Subject: | Re: amcheck (B-Tree integrity checking tool) |
Date: | 2016-10-03 01:48:17 |
Message-ID: | CAB7nPqTSR189Yn54Zh2msVoaRmg84Nbz=T+zcvJWtUUTK=bkYw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 3:44 AM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> IMV the process is to post a patch to this list to certify that it
>> is yours to contribute and free of IP encumbrances that would
>> prevent us from using it. I will wait for that post.
>
> I attach my V3. There are only very minor code changes here, such as
> breaking out a separate elevel constant for DEBUG2 traces that show
> information of how the B-Tree is accessed (e.g. current level, block
> number). Tiny tweaks to about 3 comments were also performed. These
> changes are trivial.
>
> I've also removed the tests added, since external sort regression test
> coverage is in a much better place now.
Okay, moved to next CF. I may look at it finally I got some use-cases
for it, similar to yours I guess..
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2016-10-03 01:53:54 | Re: PoC: Partial sort |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2016-10-03 01:46:30 | Re: multivariate statistics (v19) |