Re: Fwd: Core dump with nested CREATE TEMP TABLE

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fwd: Core dump with nested CREATE TEMP TABLE
Date: 2015-08-29 05:27:38
Message-ID: CAB7nPqTR6OQwDA3SYpEf33FzAygzMpeh55sZkPhTCMi+y0sVkA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>
wrote:

> On 8/28/15 8:39 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>
>>> On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 5:02 AM, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Looks like a 98k file won't get through the list...
>>>>
>>>
>> Is it compressed? Note that we have sometimes larger patches than that,
>>> but
>>> perhaps those had special permissions by the admins of this list.
>>>
>>
>> Messages significantly larger than that go through all the time. Maybe
>> you had it marked with some weird MIME type?
>>
>
> Apparently the original email did go through and my MUA search just failed
> to find it. Sorry for the noise.
>
> Original email:
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/55DFAF18.4060601@BlueTreble.com

Ah, OK, you meant this file... Yes I was able to receive it as well in your
original email. I'll try to investigate further later, but Tom may beat me
first. He usually does.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message AI Rumman 2015-08-29 05:34:38 Pg_upgrade remote copy
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2015-08-29 04:39:35 Re: proposal: multiple psql option -c