Re: [HACKERS] Support to COMMENT ON DATABASE CURRENT_DATABASE

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jing Wang <jingwangian(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Surafel Temesgen <surafel3000(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Support to COMMENT ON DATABASE CURRENT_DATABASE
Date: 2017-11-30 04:35:33
Message-ID: CAB7nPqTN-Tsg3ycSDENu+drPb5u7ae=RkLoNeDworOfrRjT5vA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 11:41 AM, Jing Wang <jingwangian(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> This is a patch for current_database working on ALTER ROLE/GRANT/REVOKE
> statements which should be applied after the previous patch
> "comment_on_current_database_no_pgdump_v4.4.patch".
>
> By using the patch the CURRENT_DATABASE can working in the following SQL
> statements:
>
> ALTER ROLE ... IN DATABASE CURRENT_DATABASE SET/RESET
> configuration_parameter
> GRANT ... ON DATABASE CURRENT_DATABASE TO role_specification ...
> REVOKE ... ON DATABASE CURRENT_DATABASE FROM ...

Moved to next CF with same status, "needs review".
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2017-11-30 04:37:35 Re: [HACKERS] Dynamic result sets from procedures
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-11-30 04:34:56 Re: pl/perl extension fails on Windows