| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | sahapasci(at)gmail(dot)com |
| Cc: | pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: libpq options |
| Date: | 2017-11-25 10:05:54 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqTMQYKO4AJ6xfz-btAtvL-=CWxYnkXUOVEQGNk4Ey1k=Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 11:36 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Yeah, it is mainly a developer option which is why I guess it is not
> documented. Like you, I think it should be added as part of the
> connection parameter, and mentioned it a couple of days back:
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAB7nPqQAtKfG3H%2BuK11JNivtJtZYE9yVCrPuejRMjp8tUDe0nQ%40mail.gmail.com
Attached is a patch as an attempt to bring together the best of both
worlds. The idea is to move the description of how the connection
parameter replication works from the replication protocol page into
the section of libpq dedicated to connection parameters, and add links
between both sections.
Thoughts?
--
Michael
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| replication-param-doc.patch | text/x-patch | 2.5 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alexander Lakhin | 2017-11-25 15:09:49 | Re: MacPorts xsltproc is very slow? |
| Previous Message | Alexander Lakhin | 2017-11-25 08:21:23 | Re: MacPorts xsltproc is very slow? |