From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: commitfest 2016-11 status summary |
Date: | 2016-12-05 06:26:09 |
Message-ID: | CAB7nPqTLfVL0+FQLGtDkTOmL3NhZrzQ17xJA7Jr_X2LuODQxiA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Micheal, I need your help in closing the commitfest.
And done. Thanks for doing this work! I was ready to use my CF vacuum
cleaner as need be, but that does not seem to be needed.
> I closed the commitfest using the following assumptions.
>
> Moved to next CF with needs review.
> 1. patch doesn't receive any full review in the commitfest
> 2. Patch received feedback at the end of commitfest.
>
> Moved to next CF with waiting on author:
> 1. Patch doesn't apply to HEAD, but didn't receive any feedback.
>
> Returned with feedback:
> 1. Patch received feedback, but author hasn't responded yet.
> 2. Author is expected to share an updated patch.
>
> Rejected:
> 1. Any -1 from committer to the approach of the patch
All that sounds fair to me.
> May be these assumptions needs to be updated, as this is the first
> time as CFM for me.
>
> I definitely may missed judging the current state of the patch. Please feel
> free to update the actual status.
That's definitely up to the authors and reviewers to double-check what
has been done and correct anything they think is not. And far as I can
see you have done an admirable work in keeping it on tracks, so huge
+1 from me.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2016-12-05 07:46:38 | Re: Write Ahead Logging for Hash Indexes |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2016-12-05 06:21:37 | Re: patch: function xmltable |