| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Cocco Gianfranco <Gianfranco(dot)Cocco(at)eng(dot)it> |
| Cc: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, DBA <DBA(at)italiaonline(dot)it> |
| Subject: | Re: [BUGS] Invalid WAL segment size. Allowed values are 1,2,4,8,16,32,64 |
| Date: | 2017-06-13 09:34:20 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqTL-czbz_aX1xb9ETr9OA50vomwwZCLgmqqCi=sHZj1Pw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-performance |
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 6:10 PM, Cocco Gianfranco
<Gianfranco(dot)Cocco(at)eng(dot)it> wrote:
> If I understand it well, we can build a new postgreSQL server, by setting
> this value into "configure" file?
>
> --with-wal-segsize=SEGSIZE becomes --with-wal-segsize=1024 ??
Yes, but as Jeff has pointed out upthread, this value can just go up
to 64 when using 9.5.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-06-13 12:57:26 | Re: BUG #14701: pg_dump fails to dump pg_catalog schema |
| Previous Message | Cocco Gianfranco | 2017-06-13 09:10:50 | R: Invalid WAL segment size. Allowed values are 1,2,4,8,16,32,64 |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-06-13 20:38:52 | Re: [BUGS] Invalid WAL segment size. Allowed values are 1,2,4,8,16,32,64 |
| Previous Message | Cocco Gianfranco | 2017-06-13 09:10:50 | R: Invalid WAL segment size. Allowed values are 1,2,4,8,16,32,64 |