From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr(at)dalibo(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: BUG: *FF WALs under 9.2 (WAS: .ready files appearing on slaves) |
Date: | 2014-10-22 13:20:51 |
Message-ID: | CAB7nPqTDiAG-AoOiZU3bFkF93pVyviYN=Ki1QWA3TfHWA9oLTw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I found one problem in the 0002 patch. The patch changes the recovery so
> that
> it creates .done files for every WAL files which exist in pg_xlog
> directory at
> the end of recovery. But even WAL files which will have to be archived
> later
> can exist in pg_xlog at that moment. For example, the latest, recycled and
> fully-written-but-not-archived-yet (i.e., maybe having .ready files) WAL
> files.
> The patch wrongly prevents them from being archived at all.
>
Re-looking at patch 2, yes you are right. Even if it was mentioned that we
should do that for a node that had promotion triggered it was not done this
way as a check on CheckForStandbyTrigger() is actually missing. Attached is
an updated patch.
> ISTM that the 0001 patch has the similar problem. Please imagine the
> following
> scenario.
> In this case, the patch seems to make the restartpoint recycle even WAL
> files
> which have .ready files and will have to be archived later. Thought?
>
Right, that's really backward. This was the approach taken before c9cc7e0,
and this commit actually prevents removal of unarchived WAL files during
recovery.
--
Michael
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
20141022_enforce_done_at_promotion.patch | text/x-diff | 4.1 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dag-Erling Smørgrav | 2014-10-22 13:21:52 | Re: [PATCH] add ssl_protocols configuration option |
Previous Message | Dag-Erling Smørgrav | 2014-10-22 13:16:56 | Re: [PATCH] add ssl_protocols configuration option |