Re: Autovacuum breakage from a734fd5d1

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Autovacuum breakage from a734fd5d1
Date: 2016-11-28 02:40:19
Message-ID: CAB7nPqTBE2xyo+Q4ZhFfkbHK6emDVZKkURDSq+GhtDfirvokcA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I pushed a patch to deal with this. I ended up simplifying the previous
> commit considerably by getting rid of the commit-multiple-deletions-per-
> transaction business. I do not think that this code will get exercised
> enough, either in the field or in testing, to justify taking a risk of
> additional bugs from that.

Oh, well, that was too late then... Thanks for addressing the issue.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2016-11-28 02:41:44 Re: Parallel bitmap heap scan
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-11-28 02:36:53 Re: Mail thread references in commits