| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Rushabh Lathia <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: incorrect error message, while dropping PROCEDURE |
| Date: | 2017-12-14 22:02:00 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqTANHcv4+zu1FGDvPJtNYY6oWD8itFzw5JtALEN-9v=TQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 12:18 AM, Peter Eisentraut
<peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 12/13/17 23:31, Rushabh Lathia wrote:
>> PFA patch, where introduced new AclObjectKind (ACL_KIND_PROCEDURE),
>> msg for the new AclObjectKind, and passed it through at
>> appropriate places.
>
> Yeah, that's a way to do it, but having both ACL_KIND_PROC and
> ACL_KIND_PROCEDURE is clearly confusing. The above-mentioned patch
> cleans that up more thoroughly, I think.
+1. I looked at the patch of Peter, as well as this one, and I prefer
Peter's approach of reducing duplications in concepts.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-12-14 22:21:00 | Re: [HACKERS] Surjective functional indexes |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2017-12-14 22:00:17 | Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix freezing of a dead HOT-updated tuple |