| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Sawada Masahiko <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Concurrently option for reindexdb |
| Date: | 2014-08-27 02:02:40 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqT8B7DHTgMcTVZ4SGhQGAAUqBrdFin9VCd+D+7MtmhUxQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> On 2014-08-26 12:44:43 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> I always was of the opinion that a exclusive lock is still *MUCH* better
> than what we have today.
Well, if somebody has some interest in that, here is a rebased patch
with the approach using low-level locks:
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAB7nPqRkwKFgn4BFUybqU-Oo-=Gcbq0K-8H93Gr6fX-GGRPDXg@mail.gmail.com
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2014-08-27 02:04:03 | Re: [RFC, POC] Don't require a NBuffer sized PrivateRefCount array of local buffer pins |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2014-08-27 02:01:39 | Re: Similar to csvlog but not really, json logs? |