| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Improve sleep processing of pg_rewind TAP tests |
| Date: | 2015-04-22 12:10:59 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqT8B4RLRAz17YFbiT3Bk-cwv8Hr6wPFPkyKY0hxgAJ4tA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 8:40 PM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> wrote:
> On 04/20/2015 05:21 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>
>> I have just made a run of the TAP tests of pg_rewind on my raspberry
>> PI 1 (hamster), where the tests are very slow, and I noticed that it
>> takes up to 10s to get confirmation from standby that it has caught up
>> with the changes from master, and 5s to get confirmation that standby
>> has been promoted. So the tests in HEAD would be broken without this
>> patch, and 30s gives visibly enough room.
>
>
> Ok, applied, with some refactoring: I put the sleep-retry loop into a
> separate function.
Thanks.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pedro Gimeno | 2015-04-22 12:30:52 | Re: Rounding to even for numeric data type |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2015-04-22 11:40:07 | Re: Improve sleep processing of pg_rewind TAP tests |