Re: error message diff with Perl 5.22.0

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: error message diff with Perl 5.22.0
Date: 2015-07-02 03:02:31
Message-ID: CAB7nPqT79VMFmMhsdYK0PPUw_+_Z0FZ9X-mnok+Tj_iXs+shfw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 11:56 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> (What about the back branches? :D)
>
> Indeed. dangomushi is complaining about this in the back branches now.

Yep, perl 5.22 is used there.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2015-07-02 03:19:59 Re: assessing parallel-safety
Previous Message Amit Langote 2015-07-02 02:57:47 Re: [PROPOSAL] VACUUM Progress Checker.