From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [REVIEW] Re: Compression of full-page-writes |
Date: | 2014-12-15 23:37:17 |
Message-ID: | CAB7nPqT6tRpsy3SrG+-DZ0Rt+UM6NedMUik5oSG1P963_Xz2xA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 5:14 AM, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> OTOH, Our built in compressor as we all know is a complete dog in
> terms of cpu when stacked up against some more modern implementations.
> All that said, as long as there is a clean path to migrating to
> another compression alg should one materialize, that problem can be
> nicely decoupled from this patch as Robert pointed out.
I am curious to see some numbers about that. Has anyone done such
comparison measurements?
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2014-12-15 23:39:51 | Re: Status of CF 2014-10 and upcoming 2014-12 |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2014-12-15 23:35:34 | Re: [REVIEW] Re: Compression of full-page-writes |