Re: 64-bit queryId?

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 64-bit queryId?
Date: 2017-10-04 01:39:18
Message-ID: CAB7nPqT6f1_advQo6EaszgZ7=6CbYVx1Jh-VXVCGKT+FBv6XFg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 10:37 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 9:34 PM, Michael Paquier
> <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> +/* Write an unsigned integer field (anything written with UINT64_FORMAT) */
>> +#define WRITE_UINT64_FIELD(fldname) \
>> + appendStringInfo(str, " :" CppAsString(fldname) " " UINT64_FORMAT, \
>> + node->fldname)
>> Correct call here.
>
> I'm sorry, but I don't understand this comment.

I just mean that your patch is correct here. I don't always complain :)
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-10-04 01:41:27 Re: Warnings in objectaddress.c
Previous Message Andres Freund 2017-10-04 01:38:56 Re: [BUGS] BUG #14825: enum type: unsafe use?