Re: pg_stat_replication.state: streaming/catchup

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Torsten Förtsch <torsten(dot)foertsch(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_stat_replication.state: streaming/catchup
Date: 2014-04-21 11:41:33
Message-ID: CAB7nPqT5YWPsQgdJ6B7rGyF29zdkF=JMWeNtaWvSZBO0m53jNw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 8:34 PM, Torsten Förtsch
<torsten(dot)foertsch(at)gmx(dot)net>wrote:

> On 21/04/14 13:18, Michael Paquier wrote:
> s there a difference in the protocol used in those phases? Maybe the
> catchup phase is optimized for bulk throughput?
>
There is no difference AFAIK, the same replication protocol is used:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.3/static/protocol-replication.html
Regards,
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dorian Hoxha 2014-04-21 11:46:51 Re: Altering array(composite-types) without breaking code when inserting them and similar questions
Previous Message Torsten Förtsch 2014-04-21 11:34:54 Re: pg_stat_replication.state: streaming/catchup