On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 5:11 PM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> wrote:
> I'm afraid if we just start using EVP_CIPHER_CTX_new(), we'll leak the
> context on any error. We had exactly the same problem with EVP_MD_CTX_init
> being removed, in the patch that added OpenSSL 1.1.0 support. We'll have to
> use a resource owner to track it, just like we did with EVP_MD_CTX in commit
> 593d4e47. Want to do that, or should I?
I'll send a patch within 24 hours.
--
Michael