Re: Fillfactor for GIN indexes

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fillfactor for GIN indexes
Date: 2015-01-16 23:23:44
Message-ID: CAB7nPqT4WOEHxxz3a7WZQKEEMwDFiHXSZmCMGKLcVhiteSGeMg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 2:40 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> There's only value in adding a fillfactor parameter to GIN indexes if
> it improves performance. There are no benchmarks showing it does.
> So, why are we still talking about this?
Indeed. There is no such benchmark as of now, and I am not sure I'll
get the time to work more on that soon, so let's reject the patch for
now. And sorry for the useless noise.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2015-01-16 23:45:07 Re: [PATCH] explain sortorder
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2015-01-16 23:20:00 Re: hung backends stuck in spinlock heavy endless loop