Re: pg_receivexlog and replication slots

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, furuyao(at)pm(dot)nttdata(dot)co(dot)jp, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_receivexlog and replication slots
Date: 2014-10-01 12:54:56
Message-ID: CAB7nPqT3madTjmOSFRMxoPKrrBPLZaFVoBybeP75oLwL2tjWog@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thanks!

On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 8:38 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
wrote:

> 0001) Old WIP patch for pg_recvlogical tests. Useful for easier
> development.
>
From where is this patch? Is it some rest from the time when pg_recvlogical
was developed?

> 0002) Copy editing that should be in 9.4
>
Definitely makes sense for a backpatch.

> 0003) Rebased patches of yours
>
0004) My changes to 0003 besides the rebase. This'll be squashed, but I
> thought it might be interesting for you.
>
(thanks for caring)
- /* Drop a replication slot */
+ /* Drop a replication slot. */
I don't recall that comments on a single line have a dot even if this
single line is a complete sentence.

-static void StreamLog();
+static void StreamLogicalLog();
Not related at all to those patches, but for correctness it is better to
add a declaration "(void)".
Except those small things the changes look good to me.

Regards,
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2014-10-01 12:59:26 Re: pg_receivexlog and replication slots
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2014-10-01 12:43:58 Re: "Value locking" Wiki page